Compare
How TriScreen Compares
Honest, fact-based comparisons. We'll tell you where competitors are better, too.
TriScreen vs Greenhouse
Greenhouse starts at ~$330/mo
Enterprise-grade ATS with structured hiring methodology. 6-12 week implementation, 1000+ job board integrations.
Where Greenhouse excels
- Massive integration ecosystem (1000+ partners)
- Structured hiring methodology
- Industry standard for enterprises
- Robust reporting and compliance
Where TriScreen wins
- Single-model AI (if any)
- $330+/month starting price
- 6-12 week implementation timeline
- Per-user pricing adds up quickly
- No self-hosted option
Our take
Greenhouse is the right choice for enterprises with 500+ employees and dedicated TA teams. TriScreen is built for agencies and teams who want better AI without the enterprise price tag.
TriScreen vs Workable
Workable starts at $149/mo
Mid-market ATS with broad feature set. Cloud-hosted, keyword-matching AI, career site builder.
Where Workable excels
- Solid all-rounder feature set
- Video interviews and assessments
- Good career site builder
- 200+ job board integrations
Where TriScreen wins
- Keyword-matching, not real AI screening
- $149+/month starting price
- Assessments and video cost extra
- No self-hosted option
- No transcript evaluation
Our take
Workable is a solid all-rounder for mid-size companies. TriScreen offers deeper AI screening at a lower price for teams that prioritize candidate evaluation quality over job board reach.
TriScreen vs Zoho Recruit
Zoho Recruit starts at $25/user/mo
Budget-friendly ATS with per-user pricing. Part of the Zoho ecosystem with basic AI scoring.
Where Zoho Recruit excels
- Low per-user price for small teams
- Deep Zoho ecosystem integration
- Customizable workflows
- Affordable for solo recruiters
Where TriScreen wins
- Per-user pricing adds up with 4+ users
- Basic AI scoring (single model)
- Zoho ecosystem lock-in
- No self-hosted option
- No transcript evaluation
Our take
Zoho Recruit is affordable for 1-2 users. For agencies with 4+ recruiters, TriScreen's flat pricing is cheaper and the AI is dramatically more capable.
TriScreen vs Ashby
Ashby starts at ~$300-400/mo
Premium ATS with excellent analytics and modern UI. Enterprise-oriented, cloud-only.
Where Ashby excels
- Excellent analytics and reporting
- Modern, polished UI
- Strong scheduling features
- Popular with engineering teams
Where TriScreen wins
- $300-400+/month
- Single-model AI at most
- Cloud-only, no self-hosted option
- Enterprise-oriented pricing
- No transcript evaluation
Our take
Ashby is the premium choice for data-driven engineering teams. TriScreen matches Ashby's analytical depth at half the price, with AI screening that Ashby can't match.
TriScreen vs Manual / Spreadsheets
Free in dollar cost, expensive in time
$0 upfront, but costs you hours per role. No AI screening, no careers page, no collaboration tools, no candidate communication automation.
Spreadsheet advantages
- Free (in dollar terms)
- Full control over process
- No vendor dependency
What you're missing
- No AI screening at all
- No careers page
- No collaboration features
- Hours of manual work per role
- No candidate communication tools
- No analytics or reporting
Our take
TriScreen Starter at $49/month costs less than the time you'd spend manually screening 20 resumes. And you get triple AI screening, a careers page, interview management, and analytics.
Start Screening Smarter Today
14-day free trial. Professional features. No credit card required.
Questions? Email us at hello@triscreen.ai